<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter: The decline of hashtags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bill.journee.org/2009/05/29/twitter-the-decline-of-hashtags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bill.journee.org/2009/05/29/twitter-the-decline-of-hashtags/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:53:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://bill.journee.org/2009/05/29/twitter-the-decline-of-hashtags/comment-page-1/#comment-2528</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bill.journee.org/?p=37#comment-2528</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a huge issue with hashtagging, though I do find it eats up my 140 characters. Perhaps I&#039;m not as succinct as I should be. I am, however, a fan of the hashtagging as in-built comment on the tweet itself. I find it amusing. 

My housemates (a couple) last night (names have been changed to protect the innocent):

@A: Lime cordial in bed. #fail 

@B: @A in bed. #fail

As far as the #followfriday - which has inexorably been condensed to #FF - I find it useful, as I still maintain quite a small twitter follow-ship, but I don&#039;t really engage in it myself, largely because I&#039;m too lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a huge issue with hashtagging, though I do find it eats up my 140 characters. Perhaps I&#8217;m not as succinct as I should be. I am, however, a fan of the hashtagging as in-built comment on the tweet itself. I find it amusing. </p>
<p>My housemates (a couple) last night (names have been changed to protect the innocent):</p>
<p>@A: Lime cordial in bed. #fail </p>
<p>@B: @A in bed. #fail</p>
<p>As far as the #followfriday &#8211; which has inexorably been condensed to #FF &#8211; I find it useful, as I still maintain quite a small twitter follow-ship, but I don&#8217;t really engage in it myself, largely because I&#8217;m too lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://bill.journee.org/2009/05/29/twitter-the-decline-of-hashtags/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 07:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bill.journee.org/?p=37#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill

Mixed emotions on this, however in general I agree with you these memes are starting to drive me mad, though have to admit to adding a couple myself.  I still like things such as #traveltuesday and #winewednesday, and to my mind that is what hashtags are for.  The other thing that is concerning is the direction these memes are taking, i.e. wandering off into the world of smut, I had no problems letting my 6 year old daughter read my twitter stream but now it is more of a problem, and if she wants to continue read it then I will have to unfollow certain folk, if I can&#039;t filter out most of the hashtag stuff.

Cheers


Darren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill</p>
<p>Mixed emotions on this, however in general I agree with you these memes are starting to drive me mad, though have to admit to adding a couple myself.  I still like things such as #traveltuesday and #winewednesday, and to my mind that is what hashtags are for.  The other thing that is concerning is the direction these memes are taking, i.e. wandering off into the world of smut, I had no problems letting my 6 year old daughter read my twitter stream but now it is more of a problem, and if she wants to continue read it then I will have to unfollow certain folk, if I can&#8217;t filter out most of the hashtag stuff.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Darren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam hills</title>
		<link>http://bill.journee.org/2009/05/29/twitter-the-decline-of-hashtags/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>adam hills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 07:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bill.journee.org/?p=37#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>#agree
I don&#039;t use hashtags all that often, mainly because I never remember to use them, and am not generally on during Friday&#039;s so don&#039;t even followfriday anyone.

Would a new standard in #tags result in that becoming the new #tag?

I too noticed the #3wordsbeforesex etc etc and - somewhat cynically of me - immediately thought of bots - along the lines of the forever lovly &#039;Britney gives head&#039; that i&#039;ve been so fortunate enough to be followed by on several occasions - so decided to ignore them. Surely I&#039;m not the only one that thinks this. If everyone started to think that way then you&#039;re right. #deathtohashtags it is i guess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#agree<br />
I don&#8217;t use hashtags all that often, mainly because I never remember to use them, and am not generally on during Friday&#8217;s so don&#8217;t even followfriday anyone.</p>
<p>Would a new standard in #tags result in that becoming the new #tag?</p>
<p>I too noticed the #3wordsbeforesex etc etc and &#8211; somewhat cynically of me &#8211; immediately thought of bots &#8211; along the lines of the forever lovly &#8216;Britney gives head&#8217; that i&#8217;ve been so fortunate enough to be followed by on several occasions &#8211; so decided to ignore them. Surely I&#8217;m not the only one that thinks this. If everyone started to think that way then you&#8217;re right. #deathtohashtags it is i guess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

